Editor's note: this article originally appeared on the morning of October 25th, 2019 on my Facebook page - if you're looking for sources, check out the comments section of the original article. For my latest piece "Polls, Joe Biden's Big Lead and other Elite Liberal Establishment Lies" please click here.
House Republicans Ratf–k Impeachment Hearing in Reckless Bid to Please Trump
My how quickly the worm turns; it
was only a couple of days ago that I was praising Rolling Stone for publishing
an intense critique of mainstream liberal neo-McCarthyism in Matt Taibbi's
excellent "Everyone is a Russian Asset" - in today's article analysis
we're going to take a look at a decidedly less impressive piece from Tim
Dickenson. I chose this article not to pick on Dickenson (whose work I find hit
and miss) but rather to highlight Rolling Stone's perplexing habit of slapping
an edgy headline on what amounts to bog standard liberalism and calling it
counterculture; the truth is that I could have picked any one of about
twenty-five articles in corporate media - they're all terrible for the exact
same reasons.
Unless you've been living under a
rock for the past forty-eight hours, there's a pretty good chance that you've
heard about the Matt Gaetz-led political theater stunt in which roughly forty
GOP Congress members "stormed" into a soon-to-begin impeachment
deposition hearing in what has been largely described in the mainstream
"liberal" media as an attempt to curry favor with the Klepto Kaiser.
To his credit, Dickenson's piece
takes a half-assed stab at poking holes in Gaetz's ridiculous claims that his
mayo mob where there to "protest a lack of transparency and due process
for the president" in the ongoing Democrat-led House impeachment inquiry
and the author is one of the few people to hint at the notable far--right
(read: fascist) element among the GOP House brigade of belligerence. Unfortunately
like virtually every other piece covering this story in the "liberal"
corporate media, the article then bogs down into simultaneously declaring the
Republican "stunt" pathetically ineffective and also over-hyping the
fact that some of Gaetz's gang entered the "Sensitive Compartmented
Information Facility (SCIF)" - an issue which only resonates with unhinged
national security liberals who think the CIA is dreamy; in other words the
exact same Bircher nutbags who already want to impeach Trump because of the
mythical "pee tape" and think Putin has decided the last twenty-five
elections in the so-called West.
Now before we go any further here I
just want to be clear about where I'm coming from; I've vocally supported
impeaching Trump from almost the precise moment he took office for a growing
list of reasons that include (but are not limited to) repeatedly profiting from
open corruption, admitting he obstructed justice on television and that whole
"being an actual goddamn fascist" thing. While I (correctly) never
bought into the Russia part of Russiagate, I've known that Trump is a crook for
a very long time and that was even before Downmarket Mussolini admitted he
fired his own FBI director for investigating him on live TV.
Furthermore, I absolutely support
impeaching Herr Donald for his attempts to use US foreign policy to leverage
American allies into persecuting his political rivals - even if those rivals
are almost certainly guilty of their own corruption, as Palooka Joe Biden
likely is in this case. In my opinion debating Trump's guilt or the legitimacy
of this impeachment inquiry pretty much went out the window when the president
(again) went on TV and asked Ukraine and China to investigate Palooka Joe; a
sentiment at least one Trump ally says was clarified by the administration to
mean "investigating corruption is an easy way to earn goodwill with
Trump" when asked by Chinese government officials "if Trump was
serious when he suggested China open an investigation into Biden."
In other words, this guy is guilty
and while I may sincerely doubt the Democratic Party's ability to get this
impeachment across the goal line, I'm very much in favor of trying. So what's
the problem with Dickenson's piece and the nearly infinite number of articles
just like it in the "liberal" corporate media?
Simple, they're wasting time selling
fairy tales about national security and our brave spies while still missing the
clear and present danger that Gaetz's little "stunt" exemplifies;
despite the clever talking point disseminated throughout the usual suspects in
the media, the GOP's slow-speed assault on the impeachment inquiry deposition
hearing did not have an audience of merely one person.
Look, I don't know if you've taking
a look at the overarching themes and tenor of GOP rhetoric surrounding the
possible impeachment of Herr Donald, but it seems pretty clear to me that these
folks are purposely trying to stir up armed protest and far right violence in
response to any attempt to impeach Trump. Sure you can say that the right has
been gibbering about a coming "Civil War" for a very long time, but
I'll remind you that we aren't talking about shock jock radio hosts here -
these are extremely prominent administration surrogates, big time Republican
donors and actual elected Republican officials trying to turn up the hate seed
to eleven and marshal the armed reactionaries whose votes and support lie
behind this entire far right movement, into the street. It's not an accident
that the Gaetz mob included an open nazi like King and a couple of casual nazi
sympathizers like Scalise or Hunter, just like it's not an accident that Sleaze
Bannon (the street fighting right wing populist who had a plan to fight Trump's
impeachment from day one) is back to defend against this threat to the Klepto
Kaiser's rule.
The Bannon-Trump plan (as frequently
hinted at in self-aggrandizing interviews by Bannon himself) always revolved
around using the threat of armed right wing crazies to keep the system from
stopping Trump's attempts to mold America into a budding white ethno-state - do
you sincerely think a guy like Roger Stone wasn't choosing his words carefully
when he said "try to impeach him. Just try it. You will have a spasm of
violence --an insurrection-- in this country like you have never seen before...
Both sides are heavily armed, my friend... this is not 1974... people will not
stand for [the impeachment of President Trump]. Any politician who votes for it
would be endangering their own life?" It's not desperation or a coincidence
that Republicans, including high-level officials in the GOP, are now speaking
in terms of a religious war, soviet-style totalitarianism, violent armed
insurrection and yes, a civil war - this is a strategy, and an extremely
dangerous one.
Will it work? Will the fascists
behind Trump be able to pull Fox News Nation into the streets to shut down any
attempt to hold Trump accountable for violating the Constitution and abusing
his (considerable) power? Well to some degree it's already working; everyone
from prosperity gospel Pastors, to Major League Baseball Umpires are now
low-key (but actively) threatening armed resistance to Trump's impeachment;
thankfully however a few random crackers with large gun collections, an army of
blackshirts does not make - for now.
Frankly the problem here is that I'm not really sure it matters precisely how *many* right wing nutjobs the pro-Trump forces convince to threaten or perhaps even carry out violence in the long run. From armed standoffs in Nevada, through the militant occupation of Oregon's Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and on to GOP minority state senators killing a climate change bill in Oregon by fleeing the capitol and hiding behind a phalanx of armed right wing militia nuts, history has demonstrated that it doesn't take a very large number of gun-toting fascists to make cowardly liberals shut up about their "rules and norms" before quietly submitting to whatever the fascists demand.
Truthfully half the time the reactionaries don't even need to get violent; anyone who saw the Gaetz Gaggle's march on television and wasn't immediately reminded of the infamous "Brooks Brothers riot" that helped end the recount and secure George W. Bush's stolen presidency in 2000, clearly hasn't been paying much attention to American history - and yet, there's no mention of the Brooks Brothers riot in this article, or the vast majority of the articles on the subject in the mainstream "liberal" media. I guess something like that just doesn't rate when compared to salacious the possibility GOP congressmen were secretly there to bug a SCIF chamber on behalf of Snowball, the greatest enemy of the people - I mean, Vladdy Putin.
*eye roll*
- nina illingworth
Independent writer, critic and analyst with a left focus.
You can find my work at ninaillingworth.com, Can’t You Read, Media Madness and my Patreon Blog.
Updates available on Twitter, Mastodon and Facebook.
Chat with fellow readers online at Anarcho Nina Writes on Discord!
No comments:
Post a Comment