Showing posts with label transphobia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transphobia. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 22, 2022

Nina-Bytes: Call and Response

 

Editor’s noteNina-Bytes is a weekday blogging series that features short analysis and commentary on articles from around the web. Want more? Click here to subscribe to NIDC today. 

 

I'm not going to lie to you folks; this isn't an article I've ever wanted to write. As someone who has written repeatedly about the consequences of normalizing eliminationist ideology, and the intimate connections between fascism and stochastic terrorism, the news that a mass shooter targeted an LGBTQ bar in Colorado Springs, killing five innocent people and wounding many more, did not surprise me; but it did hurt me, and that pain has not subsided yet. When I sat down to write about this horrifying stochastic terror attack yesterday morning, I found myself incapable of putting the event into a meaningful context. Ultimately I decided to focus on the mechanics of messaging and reaction, because that's all I could bear.

In today's edition of Nina-Bytes then, I'd like to stay inside that familiar wheelhouse; both for my own mental health, and because identifying the "call and response" nature of fascist politics, eliminationist propaganda, and stochastic terrorism is a vitally important skill during this political moment in the Pig Empire. The simple truth is, this is unlikely to be the last bloodbath. To help us cross that awful bridge, I'd like to share a couple of articles this time; starting with this November 21st, 2022 piece written by Melissa Gira Grant, and published on The New Republic:


The Massacre at Club Q Should Not Have Felt Inevitable

This was certainly not an easy one to read; but I will try to summarize. Grant opens this emotionally devastating article by correctly identifying the November 20th, 2022 attack as a "massacre" and placing it in the context of the larger LBGTQ community in Colorado Springs. As the author notes, this horrifying hate crime comes on the heels of the widespread mainstreaming of transphobic, eliminationist rhetoric from the reactionary American right; both locally, and in national Amerikkkan politics. To the surprise of precisely no one familiar with the adventures of noted Waffen-Karen Lauren Boebert, Colorado Republicans and prominent hatemongers like Chaya Raichik don't appear to have any regrets.

Crucially however, Grant also takes the time to point out that this deadly act of political violence against LGBTQ people occurred in a climate of broadly-supported transphobic rhetoric in American life; and certainly not just from right wing extremists and quasi-anonymous harassment accounts on social media:


"The steadily spreading political violence against queer and trans communities was not coming from the fringes. It was stoked by prominent Republicans pushing anti-LGBTQ legislation, amplified by media outlets including Fox, and became fodder for campaign ads. Neither was this all coming from the explicitly right, with some Democrats regarding anti-LGBTQ propaganda largely as a Republican-manufactured distraction or divisive talking point undeserving of a response. As the ACLU’s Chase Strangio noted recently, “resistance to anti-trans narratives among progressives and liberals is limited and often altogether absent.” The message sent by this reluctance to engage and defend trans people in particular, as Jennifer Finney Boylan wrote for the Washington Post, has been that trans people should “stand aside,” or else be “blamed for the ascension of conservatism.”


Finally, Grant concludes by addressing the horrifying elephant in the room that I spoke about here on NIDC last week; the fact that liberals seem to think the fight against violent, transphobic fascism in politics is over, even as some of the most anti-LGBTQ fascist politicians in the GOP easily dominated their own elections. In the face of already escalating anti-LGBTQ violence, and the political right's unfolding plans to make depersoning LBGTQ folks a fundamental plank in the ongoing fascist project, it would be utterly naïve to assume a less-bad-than-expected showing for Democrats at the ballot box, or even the political fallout from a mass shooting, will stop the ongoing pogrom on trans and queer people.

Of course, and speaking of naivety, all of this does vaguely presume the mainstream political right in America isn't just trying to suppress, terrorize, and murder LGBTQ people in America. To briefly talk about why that's a bad presumption, let's turn to this November 21st, 2022 article written by Anya Zoledziowski for Vice News:


"This Is the Point": Colorado Shooting Follows Rise in Anti-LGBTQ Vitriol

Primarily built around commentary by activist and researcher Erin Reed, this piece more or less puts anti-LGBTQ terrorism in the context of the right's war on trans and queer identities and states the obvious; the violence is unquestionably the point. Eliminationist rhetoric and fascist conspiracy theories targeting the LGBTQ community have become a persistent feature of reactionary politics in America; with completely predictable consequences:


"For several years, anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, including incendiary anti-trans and anti-drag disinformation, has been making the rounds on social media and in state legislatures, pushed by far-right personalities, including Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, the Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh, and LibsofTikTok founder Chaya Raichik. 

In 2022 alone, more than 300 anti-LGBTQ bills have been introduced in state legislatures across the U.S., according to Human Rights Campaign. Republicans like Florida Sen. Marco Rubio collectively spent at least $50 million on anti-trans ads during the midterms. Meanwhile, far-right pundits and politicians falsely accused transgender folks of being “groomers” and referred to drag queens as “pedophiles.” 


Look folks, whether a seemingly indifferent liberal media wants to acknowledge it or not, we are talking about cause and effect here. Pretending this was an unpredictable tragedy, or the inevitable result of human bigotry is myopic to the point of open collaboration with fascists. These monsters know what they're doing, and they're doing it on purpose This is confirmed by the open relationships between virulent anti-trans bigots on the fringes of the media, fascist billionaires who support the cause, and Republican politicians in government; relationships that are getting more difficult to ignore all the time. 

Speaking frankly, I am simply tired; and I know I'm not alone. I'm tired of reading eulogies for innocent marginalized people who've been murdered by fascists. I'm tired of being told I need to vote for Democrats to stop fascism while the fascist murders continue and rich liberals argue about whether or not something can even be transphobic if it's printed in the New York Times. Most of all however, I'm tired of playing footsie with collaborators who give fascist politicians every benefit of the doubt, while those same people organize against my very existence in the open. I can only speak for myself as one single trans woman, but I'd ask that you please save your prayers liberals; I can already tell we're not in your thoughts.

I don't have a message for the fascists riding transphobia to power over the dead bodies of my community; at least not one I could print here. 



nina illingworth


Anarcho-syndicalist writer, critic, and analyst. 

You can find my work at NIDCCan’t You ReadMedia Madness and my Patreon Blog

Updates available on TwitterInstagramMastodon and Facebook

Podcast at “Kropotkin’s Barbershop” on Soundcloud.

Inquiries and requests to speak to the manager @ASNinaWrites

Chat with fellow readers online at Anarcho Nina Writes on Discord!

“It’s ok Willie; swing heil, swing heil…”

 

Thursday, February 11, 2021

Film Sessions: Cancel Culture by Tom Nicholas

 


Editor's note: Film Sessions is a weekly feature here on Media Madness in which I share, analyze and expand on a relevant video created by someone on the left wing of YouTube. 


You're Not Cancelled If You're Still On My TV

I must confess that personally, I've always struggled to take the discourse around what its critics have dubbed "cancel culture" very seriously and, aside from perhaps some passing commentary on the No Fugazi Podcast, I've never really bothered to wade into the discussion with any vigor. This is, at least in part, because I am extremely online enough to know that half the folks who signed the now infamous "Harper's letter" are virulent transphobes, former friends of billionaire pedophile sex slaver Jeff Epstein, or the kind of folks who think acknowledging that Palestinians are people and deserving of basic human rights, is somehow anti-Semitic. Oh, and there's also that part where the whole debate is clearly a stalking horse for the reactionary American right; it's rather hard to take folks who call Tucker Carlson a brave truthteller very seriously, after all.

Even setting right wing f*ckery and craven self interest aside however, there has always been something about the class character of the discussion that felt significantly off to me. After all, the labor class (especially in America) overwhelmingly works under a system of "at will" employment, and can therefore be fired at any time, for almost any reason, or in many cases no reason at all - "congratulations, you've been downsized!" Yet in the larger "cancel culture" discussion you find a completely manufactured moral panic, being pushed by bougie media muppets drawn almost exclusively from the upper classes, about the possibility that other, upper class media muppets might face online criticism and the periodic book boycott, for their crappy and often bigoted opinions. The vast majority of the people whining about cancel culture haven't lost career opportunities for their odious behavior, and given their ability to find a sympathetic platform full of other bougie class media muppets to gripe about the issue incessantly, you can't really suggest they're being "silenced" somehow either. Of course, corporate or institutional censorship does indeed exist online and in the media, but we already have words for those phenomenon and any reasonable person can see that has little to do with some folks online deciding not to buy JK Rowling's next (explicitly transphobic) book because she's a piece of dogsh*t.

Taken altogether, that certainly doesn't sound like anything a labor class person should really give a damn about, so I didn't much give a damn about the "cancel culture" debate. Alas, naval gazing media minions obsessed with presenting their class grievances as mere "common sense" have never really cared about the opinions of the peasantry, and thus this "cancel culture" debate continues to rage on to this day; and sometimes, from some rather frustrating sources. In light of the interminable nature of the subject, I've been waiting for the right moment to offer some of the above opinions on the cancel culture hysteria, and this week's Film Sessions post is precisely just such an opportunity.

Today's feature sees the return of popular creator Tom Nicholas and his series What the Theory; which we examined in detail during our previous discussions about media bias and neoliberalism. At this point, I feel like we know what we're getting with Nicholas's work; longer videos with high production values, pinpoint editing, and a firm background in the kind of theory you have to actually read books to learn. In "Cancel Culture: Fear of the Mob" however, Tom also shows off a delightful talent for comedic sketch-work, and some genuinely subversive sensibilities when it comes to class issues and the nature of crowds.

This highly watchable presentation is divided into two parts, intertwined with each other throughout the entire forty-seven minute episode. This first portion is a subversive, darkly comedic, and extremely snarky little comedy sketch about the fictitious "cancellation" of Tom Nicholas, that includes winking allusions to the theatrics of notable sh*theels like Jordan Peterson, JK Rowling and indeed, the entire celebrity whining cycle surrounding cancel culture. The second part of the episode, which I'm choosing to focus on here so as not to spoil the fun for those enjoying the skit, is a far more stringent, academic study about the class issues surrounding both the spurious literature on crowd psychology, as well as the relation between "cancel culture" fearmongering in the media, and a ruling class that has promoted the idea of the bloodthirsty mob for centuries to undermine popular direct action.

Nicholas opens by examining the principle arguments and selection bias of those promoting the cancel culture moral panic, and discovers that they directly echo longstanding pro-ruling class, anti-direct action theories about the danger of mobs, and the madness of crowds, put forward by upper class, pearl-clutching muppets like Gustave Le BonCharles Mackay, and modern writers who apply the same theories to online life; folks like Jon Ronson. So what's the problem? Well, as Nicholas notes, academic studies of crowds, protests and mobs have utterly discredited those theories from a scientific perspective, and they remain with us only because they are repeated over and over as "common sense" by a ruling class that is eager to police protest actions by the proletariat, and remains altogether uncomfortable with being criticized by filthy peasants. 

Our presenter then transplants this understanding into a fascinating discussion about how the mendacious presentation of cancel culture arguments encourage us to treat all incidents of public shaming as identical (when they most certainly are not,) while observing that the very purpose of attacks on the "online mob" is to police who counts as an individual, and whose ideas are treated as valid or self-determined. Along the way Tom also kicks the crap out of that putrid, self-serving Harper's letter (while noting the obtuse tone-deafness of releasing it at the height of a fascist crackdown on demonstrators protesting the extrajudicial murder of George Floyd by an American police officer,) points out that the cancel culture discussion provides an unwarranted veneer of legitimacy for otherwise blatantly bigoted opinions or behaviors, and lays waste to the idea that online criticism has any real long-term impact on the careers of affluent whiners pushing this moral panic. 

Throw in the genuinely humorous skit, and that sure is a lot of "bang" for your time investment. As regular readers of my work will undoubtedly be aware, the above-mentioned class tensions and assaults on objectively reactionary "common sense" in capitalist societies are kind of my jam at this point, and as such I found Tom's video absolutely smashing. In fact, I would go so far as to suggest that the inclusion of these elements makes "Cancel Culture: Fear of the Mob" one of only a very few truly worthwhile videos about the subject on YouTube. 

You can check it out by clicking the header, or watching the embedded video itself, below:


"Cancel Culture: Fear of the Mob"




Additional Resources


Tom Nicholas's Youtube Channel

The Real Cancel Culture

Cancel Culture Is Not Real: At Least Not in Way People Think

Political Correctness Is Destroying America! (Just Not How You Think)

The “Free Speech Debate” Isn’t Really About Free Speech

The Real War on Free Speech

Harper's Platforms Famous Writers So They Can Whine About Being Silenced

The Class Politics of the Harper's Letter

Cancel Culture is a Class Issue

‘Cancel Culture’ Is How the Powerful Play Victim

You’re Getting Called Out, Not Canceled

Transgender people and the Harper’s Open Letter

What’s Wrong with “Cancel Culture”?

How White Religious Conservatives Invented Cancel Culture

Why the Right Is Obsessed With Cancel Culture

The “Cancel Culture” Con

Tucker Carlson, Ariel Pink and the Cancel Culture Grift

‘Cancel Culture’ Isn’t Real

The Reality of Cancel Culture Is that it Is Not Real

Don Cheadle Tells Fox News Cancel Culture is ‘A Fabrication’

Our Political Upheaval Wasn't Caused by Mob Rule

The Myth of the Mob: How Crowds Really Work

Donald Trump and the Myth of Mobocracy

How Being Part of a Crowd Can Change You For the Better

Crowds Are Not People, My Friend


nina illingworth


Independent writer, critic and analyst with a left focus. Please help me fight corporate censorship by sharing my articles with your friends online!

You can find my work at ninaillingworth.comCan’t You ReadMedia Madness and my Patreon Blog

Updates available on InstagramMastodon and Facebook. Podcast at “No Fugazi” on Soundcloud.

Inquiries and requests to speak to the manager @ASNinaWrites

Chat with fellow readers online at Anarcho Nina Writes on Discord!

“It’s ok Willie; swing heil, swing heil…”