Showing posts with label leftism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leftism. Show all posts

Thursday, September 30, 2021

In The Aggregate: Reactions


Editor's Note: In The Aggregate is a new semi-regular series bringing you links to, and commentary on stories of interest to leftists, from around the web.


Staying Busy Underwater

Since there's no easy way to say this I'm just going to be real with you folks; I have long Covid. At some point I might write about the journey that lead me to discovering this, but for now the only important thing you need to know is that I have long Covid, and I've had it for quite a while. I'm not going to die, but I'm still learning how to cope with this long-term illness, and as such it's not exactly easy for me to write essays right now. 

What I can still do however, is read, share, and briefly analyze articles by other people; people who aren't suffering from an extreme inability to focus and chronic fatigue. Is this effectively a link dump being published by a woman so desperate for content she'll try anything? In a word, yes. It's also what I'm capable of doing right now and I'm tired of getting three hundred words into an essay and then passing out exhausted. 

Please note that just because I link to an article doesn't mean I'm endorsing everything the author has ever said, or the website that article is published on. I will not link to crypto-fascists and racists, but sometimes the article you want to share is on Vox, even if you think Vox is a faux-progressive corporate propaganda shop run by rich liberals and tech barons. I should also note that I've accumulated a lot of links I want to share over the past nine months of struggling to write, so early editions of In The Aggregate are definitely going to feature a mix of new and old links; over time, I'll run out of good old links and it'll be mostly current affairs items.

Alright then, let's go; we've got a lot of long reads to cover this week and you might want to click on the links as we go along.


Fascism in the Pig Empire



The Whole Country is the Reichstag
by Adolph Reed Jr. at nonsite.org 

Well, would you look at that. After nigh on six years of having out of context Adolph Reed Jr. quotes thrown at me by crypto-fascists, lumpen reactionaries and faux vulgar Marxists who don't understand his work, a friend of mine showed me this glorious longform essay by the man himself. At almost eight thousand words, this is certainly an absorbing read, but it's also the best analysis of modern fascism in the American political context I've ever encountered; and I'm not just saying that because Reed covers so much of the same ground I've been writing about for the past half-decade either. Blending history, political theory, and incisive analysis of key current events in the rise of modern fascism, this essay provides an illuminating handle on the convergence of political, judicial, and financial power behind the re-emergence of an organized, violent right wing extremism in America. As Reed demonstrates, the United States has been on the fast track to our current fascist moment since at least Goldwater; this is the logical outcome of that trip. It is indeed "time to be blunt" about the dangers of Americanized fascism; my only question for Reed at this point is - what took you so long to get here?   


88 Tactical, Militarized Police, and a Looming Coup in Brazil by Amanda Gailey at Seeing Red

So what exactly does this nexus of political power, private sector influence and violent white supremacy look like in practice? This two thousand word banger shines a light on the peculiar relationship between members of fascist ruling family in Brazil, the Trump political organization, and a neonazi paramilitary training company in Nebraska that goes by, I kid you not, 88 Tactical. After falling at their first putsch attempt in American on January 6th, are the forces of Pig Empire fascism looking to up their game in Brazil? It sure does look like it. We've got cops, nazis and would be Führers aplenty in this story that is genuinely stranger than fiction, and yet attracted almost no mainstream media attention whatsoever. 


It’s shocking to see so many leftwingers lured to the far right by conspiracy theories by George Monbiot at the Guardian.

Given that I've spent the past eleven months setting my life on fire by trying to counteract reactionary attempts to recruit left, I'm mostly just publishing this as a belated "I told you so." Of course, just because Monbiot can correctly identify the problem of fascists using anti-establishment sentiment, Covid 19, and conspiracy thinking to recruit nominal lumpen proles who think they're leftists, doesn't mean he has any idea what to do about it. Liberal antifascism is staggeringly ineffective and always has been; the only way to stop fascism, is to make fascists (including rich fascists) too afraid to spread their poisonous ideology. In light of American capital's dependence on maintaining core principles of that ideology in order to justify exploitation for profit, I fear giving the nazis a stern talking-to might not be enough to stem the tide of legally and politically empowered fascism in the Pig Empire. 


Canada’s Far Right Is More of a Threat Than You Think by Luke Savage at Jacobin

As anyone who understands the intertwined relationship between capitalism and fascism could have predicted, the Americanized model of fascism we've grown familiar with over the past half-decade, is easily exportable to other settler capitalist countries operating under the fig-leaf of "liberal democracy." In this short piece, Luke Savage talks about the progress of a Canadian fascist movement fueled by reactionary pandemic politics and conspiracies. The People's Party of Canada may have helped Justin Trudeau stave off defeat, but now the fascists have a seat at the table in Canadian politics and that will have consequences of its own. 


Armed Picnics and Snipers at Family Dollar: Life in a Town With a Government-Approved Militia by Matt Cohen at Mother Jones

One of the hallmarks of a liberal democracy under the influence of a fascist creep, is the way civic and political power is used to lead an air of authority, respectability and normalcy to reactionary paramilitaries and vigilantes; see for example the relationship between Hindutva extremists and the Modi government in India. In this lengthy expose, Cohen takes us inside the far too close for comfort relationship between the local government in Bedford County, Virginia and far right militia groups opposed to the Black Lives Matter movement and convinced the 2020 US election was stolen from Downmarket Mussolini. If you want to know what fascism coming to America is going to look like, this article is a good place to start; although like most liberals, this author isn't actually brave enough to name the beast directly.


How the Epik hack reveals every secret the far-right tried to hide by Mikael Thalen at Daily Dot 

Speaking of stories that aren't getting nearly as much attention as they warrant from corporate mainstream media, have you heard about the 2021 Epik Data Breach? Just over two weeks ago, the hacktivist collective known as Anonymous dumped the “entire primary database” of domain registrar and web hosting company Epik, online. Run by noted sh*theel Rob Monster, Epik is important because apparently it's the critical web services company of choice for fascist websites who've been kicked off other social media platforms; including Gab, Parler, and numerous right wing extremist forums. After dragging their asses for two weeks, it would seem the mainstream media is finally (and perhaps reluctantly) on the story; I wonder how long it will taken them to find the connection between Epik and the Stop the Steal rallies that lead to the January 6th coup attempt?


Copaganda and the Police State




"We get to hear them training to kill us.”
by Christina Cauterucci at Slate

If you've ever wondered why African Americans in urban and suburban areas used to refer to local policing as "the occupation" then this is the kind of story you need to read. Ostensibly an article about the local resident's fight to remove a Cincinnati Police Department open-air firing ranged from a small, predominantly minority suburb called Lincoln Heights, this evocative longform expose is really about the constant exercise of whiteness under the guise of color-blind civic policy, to intimidate and suppress African Americans. From city services, to zoning fights, and all the way to an upcoming battle over control of the property the (hopefully) vacated shooting range resides on, it always seems that through pure coincidence, the citizens of Lincoln Heights bear the costs, while other, wealthier and whiter communities reap the rewards of modern living. That's no accident my friends; white supremacy in America has never ended, it just rebrands itself every couple of decades. 


Federal Prison's Switch to Scanning Mail is a Surveillance Nightmare by Lauren Gill at The Intercept

Even after roughly seven years of studying the American carceral machine, I am still shocked the dystopian ways our society invents to both deprive incarcerated persons of their rights and dignity, while simultaneously finding a way for someone to profit from that endeavor. In this story Federal Bureau of Prison facilities are photocopying and then keeping incoming mail in what amounts to a for-profit mass surveillance scheme. Astoundingly enough, prison officials claim this is part of "an effort to stop drugs that are entering facilities by being sprayed on mail, which officials claim is affecting staff, though there is scant evidence of this phenomenon." Let's just say prison pigs aren't exactly the brightest lights on the porch and move on.   


Five Tropes Local TV News Uses to Dehumanize Homeless People by Adam Johnson at The Column

Over the past little while, I've published two lengthy articles about both the experience of being homeless, and violent persecution of the homeless in the Pig Empire, on our main website: NIDC. In this excellent piece by media critic Adam Johnson, we get a look inside the casual propaganda employed by literally every level of media in our society, to demonize the homeless is ways that allow the dehumanization and ultimately violent persecution of innocent people who simply lack housing, every day. The manufacture of consent for authoritarian policy is a function of both domestic and foreign policies in the Pig Empire, and even its local media reflects that reality.


Copaganda and a Complicit Media: a Thread by Scott Hechinger on Twitter

Who says Twitter isn't good for anything? In this lengthy chain of posts a public defender and anti-criminalization advocate dissects the outright lies, misrepresentations, and false intimations made by one NPR reporter on behalf of American police. While the sheer number of crass fallacies exposed in this thread is certainly shocking, it's important to understand that this is just one story in an infinite sea of willful pro-police propaganda spread in mainstream U.S. media; here's another thread just like it by author and civil rights advocate Alec Karakatsanis, this time featuring copaganda published by the New York Times. Nor is this type of casual copaganda reserved for the national news; here's a reporter for the local ABC affiliate in Philadelphia pushing the absolutely bonkers idea that folks are handing out thousands of dollars worth of weed edibles as Halloween candy; why? Because some cops told her so for... reasons


Police and Racist Vigilantes: Even Worse Than You Think by John Knefel at The American Prospect

Finally, to close this section off and illustrate the "reaction" tie-in that binds this whole article together, I thought I'd share this blast from the past about the cozy, even overlapping relationship between fascists, white supremacists and American police. In a media environment dripping with pro-police copaganda, it's important to disabuse ourselves of the fiction that policing, even reformed policing, is the answer to the fascist menace; the police are after all, usually on the same side as the nazis, and always have been.  


Quotable Reading

“Whenever fascism threatens, its representatives and facilitators denounce universities and schools as sources of "Marxist indoctrination," the classic bogeyman of fascist politics. Typically used without any connection to Marx or Marxism, the expression is employed in fascist politics as a way to malign equality. That is why universities that seek to give some intellectual space to marginalized perspectives, however small, are subject to denunciation as hotbeds of "Marxism.” 

Jason Stanley, How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them


Theory Corner



A History of “Wokeness”
by Aja Romano at Vox

As folks who've read my Film Sessions articles on Cancel Culture and the 1776 Project are undoubtedly aware, I consider pushing back on fascist "culture war" narratives a necessary, if tedious, part of anti-fascist work. Today I've decided to let someone else lug the cart up the hill in the form of this lengthy and detailed examination of the term woke; its meaning, its history, and how the American right (including and especially the far right fascists) has co-opted the term and tried to alter its usage. Unfortunately, the author fails to really get into why using woke as a pejorative term is so firmly rooted in anti-Blackness. For that I'd also recommend reading "How “Woke” Became a Slur" by Joshua Adams at Colorlines. Additionally, I should mention that at some point the Vox piece calls James Lindsey "a writer" when in reality, he's a fascist provocateur with a college degree. While this may seem like old news, given the centrality of "anti-wokeness" to the crypto-reactionary movement recruiting left online, it's probably a good idea to clarify what the word actually means before letting nazis define the terms of the discourse. 


Debate Me! How To Know Things on Youtube by JohntheDuncan on YouTube

One of the wonderful things about human diversity is that we all have our own unique ways of learning or acquiring knowledge. For example, some of the folks reading this are going to be glad I included a video essay because they're hardwired to absorb information better in that format. I should warn you however that this forty minute video touches on some pretty heady concepts. In answering the seemingly simple question of "how useful is online debate culture" our presenter is forced to break down the structurally capitalist nature of the YouTube platform, and how that structure exerts pressure to privilege certain types of knowledge, ways of knowing, and (dramatic) forms of discourse. While these debates may generate easy and exciting content, they demonstrably lack the intellectual rigor and sincerity to function as a legitimate teaching tool. Finally, John illuminates how both of these pressures result in the replication of a neoliberal capitalist, Western-centric, and deeply patriarchal lens through which we understand what knowledge even is. I warned you it was heady stuff.  


Anarchism Shaped David Graeber. Then He Shaped Anarchism by Shane Little on Novara Media

I must confess that as a “capital-A” anarchist (anarcho-syndicalist) who believes in the importance of organizing around a common political and social program, closing off this edition of In the Aggregate with this particular essay may seem like a curious choice. The truth however is that for every point of disagreement I've ever had with Graeber's work, my own thoughts have been shaped and influenced in countless additional ways by his writing and ideas. If the purpose of a Theory Corner section is to challenge readers to think differently, then I see no reason why I can't subject myself to the same ritual. Crucially, Graeber's work looks towards an organic, modern theory of anarchist living that becomes more vital by the day on a planet set on boil; regardless of your (or my) commitment to classical forms. I do believe that we are indeed all poorer in a world without Dave Graeber; for more information on why please check out "David Graeber Was Right: A Debt Free World Is Possible" by Andrew Ross, and "Sex Work Is Not a Bullshit Job" by Marin Scarlett; also on Novara Media. 


  - nina illingworth


Anarcho-syndicalist writer, critic, and analyst. 

You can find my work at NIDC, Can’t You Read, Media Madness and my Patreon Blog

Updates available on Twitter, Instagram, Mastodon and Facebook. Podcast at “No Fugazi” on Soundcloud.

Inquiries and requests to speak to the manager @ASNinaWrites

Chat with fellow readers online at Anarcho Nina Writes on Discord!

“It’s ok Willie; swing heil, swing heil…”

Tuesday, December 29, 2020

Film Sessions: Oligarchs will let the world burn by Thought Slime (New)

 


Editor's note: well, it's been an interesting past couple of days for me to say the least; if you're wondering why I'm not on Twitter, please check out my latest article on ninaillingworth.com - have yourself a merry Christmas indeed. In light of the week I've been having and the fact that we're all still living through a nightmare, neofeudalist, Captain Trips holiday season, I thought I'd pick a video for this week's film session that is both viscerally satisfying and not particularly taxing on the memory banks; hopefully you enjoy this one as much as I did.


Well, despite the fact that I’m having one of the crappier weeks of my professional life, I have managed to continue picking my way through left wing YouTube channels and video creators in the middle of all the chaos. In today’s film session, I’m going to highlight a sixteen minute feature on a channel called Thought Slime. The creator behind Thought Slime first came to my attention when I was researching an article about fascism and looking for reliable citations about the crypto-fascist street gang, the Proud Boys. Although I only ended up using that video for a couple of citations, I remembered this person’s excellent (if perhaps a bit stripped down) work, and decided to check out their channel when I was poking around for more content to familiarize myself and my audience with.

Although I really don’t know that much about this creator that you can’t find on their Wikitubia page, and I must admit the delivery is at times a little dramatic, this video appealed to me because it opens by focusing on an area I’ve studied and one of the more inexplicably monstrous decisions by established American power in living memory – the wholly unnecessary bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the closing phases of World War II; conducted primarily for the purposes of intimidating the Soviet Union and opening up the era of “mutually assured destruction” in what we know today as The Cold War.

Much to my delight however, it turns out this was only the beginning of the discussion and the focus of the video is actually an issue I write about constantly, even though it seems to alienate many of the folks around me – the fact that rich people are absolutely fine with killing every last one of us for pennies on the dollar, while trying to enact out unhinged Lex Luthor-esque fantasies about running to Mars, rather than surrender one single iota of power, influence or ability to exploit their fellow man for profit. On this issue, Thought Slime and I could not be more in agreement (which perhaps makes sense, since we’re both apparently anarchists) and it is refreshing to find someone, anyone else, willing to say this out loud; I am absolutely chuffed about the mere existence of this video.

In addition to World Wars and nuclear annihilation, Thought Slime also touches on the fossil fuel industry, a coronavirus response that looks like eugenics and how the election of Donald Trump caused them to question fundamental assumptions about how the world works, eventually leading our host to anarchism (and me to a couple more Youtube creators to add to my “check em out” list.) The end result is a highly entertaining attack on rule by elites, the power of the state and Piers Morgan eating something called a “Santa’s Yum Nut” - and for a sixteen minute video that also features a brief side discussion about Indigenous Christian Anarchism in Taiwan, that’s probably the most you can hope for.

If I do have one quibble however, it’s that Thought Slime clearly uses “the state” and “elite rule” to mean precisely the same things and that’s a fine rhetorical position to adopt, but probably could have been explained better to an audience that is unlikely to have read most of the books on the wonderful reading list the creator shows at 8:11. Naturally, as an anarcho-syndicalist myself, I’m not looking to eliminate the state so much as eliminate the difference between state power and people power – in essence, through an aggressively participatory democracy, to make the common people, into the state itself. Obviously however Thought Slime and I both clearly agree that elite rule has gotta go and thus, I had no real problem with how they were using the terms interchangeably – and including my favorite Rudolf Rocker book on the reading list certainly warmed my heart to see.


Oligarchs will let the world burn.



Additional Resources




Praxis of Evil

The Hammering In My Head

Six Things I Think: Tomb-World Politics Edition

Capitalism, Climate Crisis & the Rise of Fascism in the Pig Empire

Rocker Anarcho-Syndicalism Theory and Practice Discussion





- nina illingworth


Independent writer, critic and analyst with a left focus. Please help me fight corporate censorship by sharing my articles with your friends online!

You can find my work at ninaillingworth.comCan’t You ReadMedia Madness and my Patreon Blog

Updates available on TwitterInstagramMastodon and Facebook. Podcast at “No Fugazi” on Soundcloud.

Inquiries and requests to speak to the manager @ASNinaWrites

Chat with fellow readers online at Anarcho Nina Writes on Discord!

“It’s ok Willie; swing heil, swing heil…”


Thursday, December 24, 2020

Film Sessions: An Economic Hit Man Confesses and Calls to Action from TEDxTraverseCity featuring John Perkins

 


Editor's note: right, so as I mentioned last night, ongoing Facebook f*ckery is forcing me to move my weekly film sessions posts over here, to Media Madness. Thankfully, this is the last backlogged video I have to crosspost and then going forward I'll just post new film sessions here and on Facebook simultaneously.

This post originally appeared on my Facebook Page on December 22nd, 2020.

-----

Okay, it seems like maybe I’m going to put things in the can for Christmas after all, despite having no plans really for this plague holiday. I’m feeling pretty run down, social media isn’t very much fun since this Dore-AOC debate broke, and my hype-man needs time off to recharge and visit loved ones. I did however promise a Sunday film study, and I’m here to deliver – albeit a day late.

Ideally, over the break I plan to finish another two film study posts and probably another Media Madness blog, if I can fit in some time after Christmas, but before the new year. Otherwise, please accept my hopes that you find a way to make a happy holiday out of these unique circumstances and I’ll be back with more formal writings sometime around January 2nd, 2021.


Earlier this week, I found myself hunting for a specific quote from New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins, when I stumbled across this remarkable eighteen minute Tedx Talk he gave that I'm going to share with you today in our weekly Film Session. 

First things first, I should remind you that as a Tedx Talk, and not just a regular TED Talk, this event merely copies the TED Talk format and was put together independently by people in Traverse City. Which makes a certain amount of sense, because Perkins describes  precisely the kind of networks of economic power generated by corporations, the U.S. and American-aligned governments, the Pig Empire's covert agencies and yes, the U.S. military, that the truly elite Tech Bros and Davos Divas really would rather not talk about. So who is John Perkins and what is his book really about? Let’s turn to Wikipedia for a more concise answer than I would have written:

“The book heavily criticizes U.S. foreign policy and the widely accepted notion that "all economic growth benefits humankind, and that the greater the growth, the more widespread the benefits." Perkins suggests that, in many cases, only a small portion of the population benefits at the expense of the rest, pointing to, as an example, an increase in income inequality, whereby large U.S. corporations exploit cheap labor, and oil companies destroy local environment.

Perkins describes what he calls a system of corporatocracy and greed as the driving forces behind establishing the United States as a global empire, in which he took a role as an "economic hit man" to expand its influence.

Perkins' function, according to the book, was to convince the political and financial leadership of developing countries to accept enormous development loans from institutions like the World Bank and USAID. Saddled with debts they could not hope to pay, such countries would then be forced to acquiesce to political pressure from the United States on a variety of issues. Perkins argues that these nations were effectively neutralized politically, with their wealth gaps driven wider and their long-term economies crippled. In this capacity, Perkins recounts his meetings with some prominent individuals, including Graham Greene and Omar Torrijos. Perkins describes the role of an economic hit man as follows:

Economic hit men (EHMs) are highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. They funnel money from the World Bank, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and other foreign "aid" organizations into the coffers of huge corporations and the pockets of a few wealthy families who control the planet's natural resources. Their tools included fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and murder. They play a game as old as empire, but one that has taken on new and terrifying dimensions during this time of globalization.”

Of course, to say that given this type of backstory Perkins himself is a bit of an odd duck, would be a massive understatement, and when he first published Confessions of an Economic Hit Man back in 2004, his quirky personality and bizarre work history, were quickly weaponized by various appendages of the establishment to try and discredit the damning story his book had just told the world. 

A funny thing happened when folks started to investigate into Perkins however, they discovered that on the whole, most of the claims that would be verifiable, checked out. Yes, he was in fact an economist with the then-powerful, U.S. government connected but widely anonymous firm Chas T. Main, yes he was in the developing countries he said he was, during the times he said he’d visited them, and yes, at one point Perkins’ boss at the firm said: “Basically his story is true.… What John's book says is, there was a conspiracy to put all these countries on the hook, and that happened. Whether or not it was some sinister plot or not is up to interpretation, but many of these countries are still over the barrel and have never been able to repay the loans” - although it should be noted that the executive, Einar Greve, would later walk back admitting the firm’s association with the NSA and some minor, but salacious parts of Perkins’ personal backstory.

The real eye-opener however was when the U.S. occupation and sham rebuilding of Iraq was exposed as a complicated American corporate welfare and influence trading scheme, virtually identical to the trap of debt, bombs and murder Perkins described in Confessions of an Economic Hitman. You’ll even hear him bring up a famous name from both his story, and the Iraq privatization scandals – Halliburton; remember them? Overall, there is a certain spy games, or cloak and dagger element to Perkins’ telling of his life story, but the simple truth is that this web of personal economic incentives for neocolonialist elites, trade agreements contingent on the installation and maintenance of a neofeudalist economy, or the brute force of Pig Empire missiles, taken together to form the system of control the author describes, are today well known as the tools by which America maintains global supremacy in a post-Cold War world.  

Although this eighteen minute video below represents a decent enough overview of what Perkins exposed to the world, and the man is certainly no socialist, I would still encourage you to read (The New) Confessions of an Economic Hitman as a study in how the forces of debt, violence and capitalism come together to propagate Pig Empire rule over most of the planet. Furthermore, as I suggested in my original Instagram post, you could consider combining this with a review of Stanley Butler’s “War is a Racket” and former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis’ “Adults in the Room” for a very thorough examination of how global capitalism actually works, from a behind the scenes perspective offered by actors in multiple different parts of the filthy drama and swindle. 

In the meantime, please check out this short introduction spoken (rather quickly) by John Perkins himself, and try not to get caught up in his bizarre insistence that that there’s a difference between “good capitalism” and “predatory capitalism.”


An Economic Hit Man Confesses and Calls to Action






- nina illingworth


Independent writer, critic and analyst with a left focus. Please help me fight corporate censorship by sharing my articles with your friends online!

You can find my work at ninaillingworth.comCan’t You ReadMedia Madness and my Patreon Blog

Updates available on TwitterInstagramMastodon and Facebook. Podcast at “No Fugazi” on Soundcloud.

Inquiries and requests to speak to the manager @ASNinaWrites

Chat with fellow readers online at Anarcho Nina Writes on Discord!

“It’s ok Willie; swing heil, swing heil…”

Film Sessions: The Myth of a Free Press: Media Bias Explained from What the Theory? by Tom Nicholas

 


Editor's note: with Facebook continuing to threaten anarchist content, so I've been forced to move my weekly pinko film session posts here, to Media Madness.

This post originally appeared on my Facebook Page on December 19th, 2020.

-----

Unfortunately I got tied up this past weekend finishing off a couple of essays and in the commotion, I forgot to leave time for our weekly film session. Now that I’ve published a few things and had a chance to catch my breath, I thought I’d post a make-up session today. 

This time I want to take a look at a rather lengthy video (55 minutes) by a creator who is really quite new to me; What the Theory’s Tom Nicholas. Now according to his rather thin Wikipedia stub, Nicholas is “a British economist currently the William J. Abernathy Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School” - which is kind of funny because he looks like the kid who shags balls at a football match, and most of his videos seem to be about philosophy, or political and social theory. Whether or not this is as a result of a Wikipedia identification mistake featuring two guys with the same name (the picture looks like the same dude,) I couldn’t tell you, but based on my extremely limited sample of one video – Tom is a pretty smart guy, with at least a reasonably nuanced grasp of media theory in a capitalist environment.

More interesting to us however, is the fact that while he’s hardly Leon Trotsky, Nicholas does appear to be at least a bit of a soft socialist; perhaps a low-key Corbynite running just a bit left of the average American democratic socialist. Although a quick scan of his Youtube channel shows that as a younger creator it took Tom a while to find his stride, and the pop culture and politics videos he makes seem of very dubious quality, his left perspective on major political and social theories videos are absolute master-classes in nerdy, informative Youtube videos; including shockingly high production values. 

In today’s extended-length What the Theory video, Nicholas takes an extremely granular look at the reality of media bias under private control inside a supposedly adversarial and heroic free press; which as you may well know by now is a subject near and dear to my heart. What makes Tom’s work here at least a little unique however is that he combines the ideas of media theorists Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky, as well as a little bit of Marxist sociologist and foundational cultural theorist Stuart Hall, with key observations using an actual BBC story from earlier this year, about the so-called “migrant crisis,” a British version of the American “migrant caravan” scare, to demonstrate how the propaganda model works to establish bias in practice. Indeed, the overall thrashing Nicholas gives the supposedly unbiased, public broadcaster (the BBC) is frankly worth the price of admission on this video by itself, but American viewers will discover that Tom consistently finds ways to relate content about British media back to the American media environment, which prevents the piece from becoming too localized to be of use to half the people reading this.

Nicholas opens by dissecting a BBC Newsnight presentation about a raft full of Iraqi asylum-seekers crossing the English Channel, and shows how through the use of framing, suggestive language, and a careful selection bias of consulted experts, the program strongly encourages you to assume certain ideas about, and attitudes towards the migrants. As will undoubtedly be all too familiar to U.S. viewers constantly inundated with propaganda demonizing migrants, these things are all bad; ideas like migrant crossings are a national crisis, migrants might be dangerous to British citizens, and something must be done to stop, um, destitute refugees fleeing Pig Empire wars. With this analysis as background context, Tom then goes on to explain the political, cultural, and of course financial reasons why the Newsnight program adopts these positions and encourages its viewers to do the same. Finally, using both the propaganda model, and Stuart Hall's theories about representation and meaning, our presenter demonstrates that not only is the media biased on behalf of wealth and power, but also in favor of the social and cultural hierarchies necessary to maintain the current order; which in today's Pig Empire society, means an order of unrestrained corporate power.

The end result is a satisfying (albeit earnest) video that does a very good job of bringing media bias bible Manufacturing Consent out of the late Cold War period, and into a thoroughly modernized and corporatized context. A great example of this might be how despite Manufacturing Consent’s hyper-focus on the issues of American imperialism and media bias, Nicholas demonstrates how the five propaganda filters work to shape coverage of issues the viewer will directly counter in their everyday life; like coverage of policing, Astroturf campaigns, and yes, the nature of establishment reporting on the so-called “migrant crisis.” Coincidentally, the fact that Nicholas’s work builds on the Five Filters of the Modern Media video I shared with you months ago, and touches on or reinforces some of the things I’ve been writing myself about the propaganda value of distorted framing in media stories, and the corporate media origins of “fake news” and lack of trust in the media institution as a whole, is just icing on the cake. I’ll include a number of related links for you to explore more if you so desire, in the comments below.

If I had to quibble with Tom’s work here, my first complaint would probably be the failure to even mention Michael Parenti and his 1986 work Inventing Reality; a book which Herman and Chomsky clearly borrowed from liberally (pun intended) without attribution – which is sometimes called “plagiarism” when you’re not America’s most celebrated “anarchist” intellectual. Furthermore, I would have liked to have seen a little more direct attack on the capitalist distortion of the final media product consumers are presented with, ala McChesney, and maybe even some explanation of how all encompassing the media propaganda sphere is, drawing on say a theorist like Marshall McLuhan. Given that the video is already fifty-five minutes long however, perhaps that is too big of an ask at this point.

All in all, this is a wonderful video if you’ve never read Manufacturing Consent, and still a reasonably worthwhile experience if like me, you most certainly have. That’s why I picked it for this week’s extremely late film study.


The Myth of a Free Press: Media Bias Explained



Additional Resources









- nina illingworth


Independent writer, critic and analyst with a left focus. Please help me fight corporate censorship by sharing my articles with your friends online!

You can find my work at ninaillingworth.comCan’t You ReadMedia Madness and my Patreon Blog

Updates available on TwitterInstagramMastodon and Facebook. Podcast at “No Fugazi” on Soundcloud.

Inquiries and requests to speak to the manager @ASNinaWrites

Chat with fellow readers online at Anarcho Nina Writes on Discord!

“It’s ok Willie; swing heil, swing heil…”


Film Sessions: Jim Crow, Neoliberalism, And The Current Fascist Backlash Against Civil Rights Movements from Some More News with Cody Johnson

 


Editor's note: with Facebook continuing to threaten anarchist content, so I've been forced to move my weekly pinko film session posts here, to Media Madness.

This post originally appeared on my Facebook Page on December 6th, 2020.

-----

Quite frankly, I'm in the middle of a blog post that won't let me finish and I've had a maddeningly unproductive week that also didn't leave a whole lot of time for watching Youtube. So today I'm going to go back to Cody Johnson and Some More News to share one of the few videos I did watch this week, entitled "Jim Crow, Neoliberalism, And The Current Fascist Backlash Against Civil Rights Movements."

Now keeping in mind that this video was published on October 24th of this year, and thus some of the commentary on the (then) upcoming US election is slightly out of date, it's also fairly clear that Johnson recorded the material assuming that Joe Biden would in fact win the election - which due to the screwed up way the American electoral college works, and Trump's temper tantrum "chicken coup," was a little touch and go for way longer than it should have been, but ultimately did turn out to be the correct assumption.

With that noted however, the reason I'm sharing this video here today is because I'm tired, and after taking a tremendous amount of abuse for calling a fascist Trump administration, well, fascist, both over the past four years and astoundingly, even quite recently on social media from black helicopter leftists who read a lot of Ben Beanwald - someone sent me this video to remind me that I wasn't the only one who saw Trump and Trumpism for what they really were; I was just perhaps among the first.

In this thirty-nine minute feature, Cody Johnston manages to humorously examine vast swathes of American history to expose the triangle between capitalist exploitation, codified white supremacy, and the fascist backlash against any social progress by the marginalized, particularly African Americans. Johnston draws clear parallels between Jim Crow era America, and the modern fascist movement that solidified in American politics as Trumpism, while simultaneously demonstrating the role neoliberalism has had in creating the conditions necessary to produce fascism in the first place. It's funny, it's informative, and most importantly Cody is correct; which is a consistent feature of Some More News videos about American fascism.

Although it's not the entire focus of this episode, and Johnson's examination of the role of Jim Crow laws in particular (instead of general white supremacy and the doctrine of white nationalism, as I had) are crucial to the production, I can also say that Cody managed to fit about 90% of the things I wrote about the Pork Reich and all-American fascism into roughly half of a 40 minute video. Just about the only thing I wished he'd spent more time on here is the role of tech bro fascist billionaires in backstopping and funding this whole sh*tshow. 

In the end, realizing that folks like Johnston were also seeing what I'd seen, was just the antidote I needed to get over being gaslit by crypto-reactionaries, who aren't even anti-capitalists, claiming to be "the real left" online - including many popular influencers like Glenn Greenwald, Jimmy Dore, and others.

I'll place some related links in the comments, including another short video by the Gravel Institute on why the Electoral College is bullsh*t, for added value. But yeah, I told you so; and if you're smart, you'll listen when I tell you that beating swine emperor Trump doesn't mean we've beaten fascism - these guys aren't going anywhere.


Jim Crow, Neoliberalism, And The Current Fascist Backlash Against Civil Rights Movements



Additional Resources











- nina illingworth


Independent writer, critic and analyst with a left focus. Please help me fight corporate censorship by sharing my articles with your friends online!

You can find my work at ninaillingworth.comCan’t You ReadMedia Madness and my Patreon Blog

Updates available on TwitterInstagramMastodon and Facebook. Podcast at “No Fugazi” on Soundcloud.

Inquiries and requests to speak to the manager @ASNinaWrites

Chat with fellow readers online at Anarcho Nina Writes on Discord!

“It’s ok Willie; swing heil, swing heil…”