Editor's note: this article originally appeared September 26 on Facebook; for my latest piece "On "Left Wing" American Media and Class Tensions in the 2020 Democratic Party Nomination Contest" please click here. All analysis by Nina Illingworth unless otherwise indicated.
-----
In today's article analysis piece I'd like to take a look at a very
important expose that was recently picked up in America by Teen Vogue -
I'm sharing the original here out of solidarity for indie and activist
media and because DesmogUK has a great graphic that shows all the
companies and think tanks they're talking about in the article.
I
happened to run across this important piece by Mat Hope while I was
writing about the U.S.
media's obscenely moronic coverage of Greta Thunberg's visit to the UN myself and I'm including it today so we can
discuss it in a much broader perspective than just "stories about
Greta."
In regards to Thunberg, I really don't see much point in
debating the effectiveness of her activism and I frankly don't care
whether or not you "trust her" because I can't really see why it
matters.
You can tell me that she's just giving all those
corrupt planet-murdering politicians a free photo-op and I'll agree with
you readily enough. I will however also counter by asking you precisely
what she was supposed to do - stay home? You can say that screaming at
politicians on TV isn't going to solve the problem and that's absolutely
correct, but I'll say at least she got to scream at them. I'd like to
scream at them, wouldn't you? I think at the point that you were
expecting a sixteen year old climate activist from Sweden to start the
green socialist energy revolution we're going to need to actually save
our species; you kind of already jumped the shark.
What I'd like
to talk about instead is the network of oil-soaked think tanks,
reactionary media organizations and talking head right wing pundits this
piece exposes and what you can extrapolate about the larger western
media environment from its re-posting on Teen Vogue.
At this
point I don't really think it's "breaking news" to most observers on the
left that there is a massive, billionaire and corporate funded climate
catastrophe disinformation network operating on the right (and even in
the center) of the American political class - including donors,
politicians and the various corporate media factions. This is now an
established fact even in milquetoast mainstream liberal circles -
although not necessarily among the "liberal" elite who have a vested
interest in climate science denial no matter how much they pretend
otherwise.
Okay so why is that? After all, when independent
media first exposed the Koch Industries connection to the anti-climate
science wing of the larger American "Tea Party" (also a Koch funded
astroturf operation, with lots of help from Wall Street oddly enough) it
was immediately derided as a "conspiracy theory" by all the usual
suspects.
So what's different about this "conspiracy theory" and
say the Bernie Sanders media blackout; what makes this now
widely-accepted story a proven "conspiracy" while the American left's
direct quotation of Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent" to explain the
Washington Post's bias against grassroots organizing and the larger (and
diverse) labor class is merely a "conspiracy theory?" It certainly
can't be a question of sources or proof - roughly seventy-five percent
of Manufacturing Consent is raw data that demonstrates corporate media
really does have an implicit and inescapable bias towards establishment
power.
The simple answer is that due to factionalism and
divergent interests in the upper classes of American establishment
power, this issue was reported on fairly and extensively in the
mainstream corporate media; albeit primarily by "liberal" outlets. I
could write a whole essay about precisely why the "liberal" media
corporations (who are still very much tied into oil, or at least the
economy built entirely around it) chose to run with this story instead
of all the other stories but the long and short of it is that the Koch
network attacks on bog standard center-right Democrats were more painful
than losing some fossil fuel executive donors and thus the "liberal"
establishment fought back - by letting their in-pocket media lapdogs
actually do some journalism for once.
So while the idea that a
bunch of right wing nutjob billionaires have brought together political
parties, think tanks, media organizations and puppet scientists to lie
about murdering the planet for profit is on its face shocking and
scandalous - the fact is you can buy books about the subject in
mainstream book stores and you'll read about it in mainstream
"left-leaning liberal" publications on a fairly regular basis. That in a
nutshell is why everyone knows about this "conspiracy" and nobody
except disingenuous right wing propagandists calls you "crazy" for
talking about it.
If you take a step back and look at the larger
political and class warfare picture however, the exposure of this right
wing pro-fossil fuel industry propaganda network lying in plain sight
does bring up a number of interesting, if not disturbing questions.
If a network of right wing elites can literally up and buy a revolution
to protect Wall Street, promote climate science denial and smear left
wing activists at will in the public sphere, what else might rich people
with ulterior motives be capable of? If the reason the vast majority of
people have ever even heard of the Koch Network behind this propaganda
machine is pretty much entirely because they broke class solidarity and
attacked their "liberal" peers in the media, what happens when the mass
murdering billionaire liars *don't* break class solidarity and both
"sides" of the mainstream media agree that the proles don't need to
know?
If this group of right wing billionaires can deploy a whole
disinformation campaign to drown Greta's words out in waves of angry
bullsh*t in a matter of days, what might *other* groups of wealthy,
powerful and influential people be doing with their time and money that
you never, or rarely ever hear about?
Could the Democratic
Party, elite donors and dozens of friendly in-pocket media puppets come
together to smear the burgeoning American labor class left and rig a
nomination contest for a crooked rich white lady? Could the editorial
staff at the Washington Post meet and agree they were only going to
print stories that portrayed left wing American politicians and
activists working against Jeff Bezo's class interests in a negative
light? Could an influential "liberal" think tank bring together a
coalition of elite party officials, media figures, wealthy donors and
even 2020 Dem Primary candidates to plot how to stop a seemingly
imminent Bernie Sanders presidency? Could a secret liberal media Slack
channel be used to quickly disseminate a fake Iowa poll and create a
narrative of inevitability for Liz Warren? Could that same media Slack
channel and preexisting relationships with a variety of liberal
"activist" organizations be used to recycle a 2008 smear campaign
against Obama supporters and widely promote the idea that working class
leftists who won't vote for neoliberals are secretly racist, sexist
Bernie Bro scum who're really a lot like the fascist right except in
some ways worse?
The answer to all of these questions is of
course yes and if you've been reading independent media or writers who
openly support Sanders, you've heard about every single one of these
real stories - even if the vast majority of liberals and labor class
folks who aren't plugged into politics have not. This is of course a
huge part of the problem but the honest truth here is that it's only the
tip of the iceberg because you *can* still read about these
demonstrably true, real life plots against left wing, labor class voters
*someplace* on the internet.
What should really keep you up at
night frankly, is the realization that there are almost certainly
thousands if not an infinite number of horrifying and impossible to
comprehend plots against the labor class that you have never even heard
of - no matter how plugged in you are. After all the only real
requirements involved here are money, access to a public megaphone of
some type and a seething animus for people who ask you to share some of
your ill-gotten wealth with the poorest members of society; and almost
every rich person in the western world is all stocked up on those three
key ingredients.
In a society where the difference between a
conspiracy theory and a conspiracy fact pretty much comes down to
whether or not the truth damages the ruling class in some manner, it's
the rich man's open conspiracies that you *don't* know about or are
never reminded about, that represent the greatest threats to us all.
- nina illingworth
Independent writer, critic and analyst with a left focus.
You can find my work at
ninaillingworth.com,
Can’t You Read,
Media Madness and my
Patreon Blog.
Updates available on
Twitter,
Mastodon and
Facebook.